Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:fff1f300 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/net/core/
H A Drequest_sock.cfff1f300 Fri Oct 02 13:43:23 CDT 2015 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> tcp: add a spinlock to protect struct request_sock_queue

struct request_sock_queue fields are currently protected
by the listener 'lock' (not a real spinlock)

We need to add a private spinlock instead, so that softirq handlers
creating children do not have to worry with backlog notion
that the listener 'lock' carries.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fff1f300 Fri Oct 02 13:43:23 CDT 2015 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> tcp: add a spinlock to protect struct request_sock_queue

struct request_sock_queue fields are currently protected
by the listener 'lock' (not a real spinlock)

We need to add a private spinlock instead, so that softirq handlers
creating children do not have to worry with backlog notion
that the listener 'lock' carries.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
/openbmc/linux/include/net/
H A Drequest_sock.hfff1f300 Fri Oct 02 13:43:23 CDT 2015 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> tcp: add a spinlock to protect struct request_sock_queue

struct request_sock_queue fields are currently protected
by the listener 'lock' (not a real spinlock)

We need to add a private spinlock instead, so that softirq handlers
creating children do not have to worry with backlog notion
that the listener 'lock' carries.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fff1f300 Fri Oct 02 13:43:23 CDT 2015 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> tcp: add a spinlock to protect struct request_sock_queue

struct request_sock_queue fields are currently protected
by the listener 'lock' (not a real spinlock)

We need to add a private spinlock instead, so that softirq handlers
creating children do not have to worry with backlog notion
that the listener 'lock' carries.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
/openbmc/linux/net/ipv4/
H A Dinet_connection_sock.cfff1f300 Fri Oct 02 13:43:23 CDT 2015 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> tcp: add a spinlock to protect struct request_sock_queue

struct request_sock_queue fields are currently protected
by the listener 'lock' (not a real spinlock)

We need to add a private spinlock instead, so that softirq handlers
creating children do not have to worry with backlog notion
that the listener 'lock' carries.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>