Searched hist:f11135a3 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | dccp.h | f11135a3 Wed Nov 28 07:34:53 CST 2007 Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> [DCCP]: Dedicated auxiliary states to support passive-close
This adds two auxiliary states to deal with passive closes:
* PASSIVE_CLOSE (reached from OPEN via reception of Close) and
* PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (reached from OPEN via reception of CloseReq)
as internal intermediate states.
These states are used to allow a receiver to process unread data before
acknowledging the received connection-termination-request (the Close/CloseReq).
Without such support, it will happen that passively-closed sockets enter CLOSED
state while there is still unprocessed data in the queue; leading to unexpected
and erratic API behaviour.
PASSIVE_CLOSE has been mapped into TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT, so that the code will
seamlessly work with inet_accept() (which tests for this state).
The state names are thanks to Arnaldo, who suggested this naming scheme
following an earlier revision of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
f11135a3 Wed Nov 28 07:34:53 CST 2007 Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> [DCCP]: Dedicated auxiliary states to support passive-close
This adds two auxiliary states to deal with passive closes:
* PASSIVE_CLOSE (reached from OPEN via reception of Close) and
* PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (reached from OPEN via reception of CloseReq)
as internal intermediate states.
These states are used to allow a receiver to process unread data before
acknowledging the received connection-termination-request (the Close/CloseReq).
Without such support, it will happen that passively-closed sockets enter CLOSED
state while there is still unprocessed data in the queue; leading to unexpected
and erratic API behaviour.
PASSIVE_CLOSE has been mapped into TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT, so that the code will
seamlessly work with inet_accept() (which tests for this state).
The state names are thanks to Arnaldo, who suggested this naming scheme
following an earlier revision of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/dccp/ |
| H A D | proto.c | f11135a3 Wed Nov 28 07:34:53 CST 2007 Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> [DCCP]: Dedicated auxiliary states to support passive-close
This adds two auxiliary states to deal with passive closes:
* PASSIVE_CLOSE (reached from OPEN via reception of Close) and
* PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (reached from OPEN via reception of CloseReq)
as internal intermediate states.
These states are used to allow a receiver to process unread data before
acknowledging the received connection-termination-request (the Close/CloseReq).
Without such support, it will happen that passively-closed sockets enter CLOSED
state while there is still unprocessed data in the queue; leading to unexpected
and erratic API behaviour.
PASSIVE_CLOSE has been mapped into TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT, so that the code will
seamlessly work with inet_accept() (which tests for this state).
The state names are thanks to Arnaldo, who suggested this naming scheme
following an earlier revision of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
f11135a3 Wed Nov 28 07:34:53 CST 2007 Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> [DCCP]: Dedicated auxiliary states to support passive-close
This adds two auxiliary states to deal with passive closes:
* PASSIVE_CLOSE (reached from OPEN via reception of Close) and
* PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ (reached from OPEN via reception of CloseReq)
as internal intermediate states.
These states are used to allow a receiver to process unread data before
acknowledging the received connection-termination-request (the Close/CloseReq).
Without such support, it will happen that passively-closed sockets enter CLOSED
state while there is still unprocessed data in the queue; leading to unexpected
and erratic API behaviour.
PASSIVE_CLOSE has been mapped into TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT, so that the code will
seamlessly work with inet_accept() (which tests for this state).
The state names are thanks to Arnaldo, who suggested this naming scheme
following an earlier revision of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|