Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:"6 eedc701" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/fs/
H A Dsync.c6eedc701 Tue Jul 03 09:45:27 CDT 2012 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback

In principle, a filesystem may want to have ->sync_fs() called during sync(1)
although it does not have a bdi (i.e. s_bdi is set to noop_backing_dev_info).
Only writeback code really needs bdi set to something reasonable. So move the
checks where they are more logical.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
6eedc701 Tue Jul 03 09:45:27 CDT 2012 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback

In principle, a filesystem may want to have ->sync_fs() called during sync(1)
although it does not have a bdi (i.e. s_bdi is set to noop_backing_dev_info).
Only writeback code really needs bdi set to something reasonable. So move the
checks where they are more logical.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
H A Dfs-writeback.c6eedc701 Tue Jul 03 09:45:27 CDT 2012 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback

In principle, a filesystem may want to have ->sync_fs() called during sync(1)
although it does not have a bdi (i.e. s_bdi is set to noop_backing_dev_info).
Only writeback code really needs bdi set to something reasonable. So move the
checks where they are more logical.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
6eedc701 Tue Jul 03 09:45:27 CDT 2012 Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> vfs: Move noop_backing_dev_info check from sync into writeback

In principle, a filesystem may want to have ->sync_fs() called during sync(1)
although it does not have a bdi (i.e. s_bdi is set to noop_backing_dev_info).
Only writeback code really needs bdi set to something reasonable. So move the
checks where they are more logical.

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>