Searched hist:fc163831 (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/queue/ |
| H A D | tx.h | fc163831 Sun Oct 22 09:55:51 CDT 2023 Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
[ Upstream commit 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 ]
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
| H A D | tx.c | fc163831 Sun Oct 22 09:55:51 CDT 2023 Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
[ Upstream commit 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 ]
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/ |
| H A D | tx.c | fc163831 Sun Oct 22 09:55:51 CDT 2023 Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
[ Upstream commit 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 ]
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/ |
| H A D | iwl-trans.h | fc163831 Sun Oct 22 09:55:51 CDT 2023 Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
[ Upstream commit 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 ]
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/ |
| H A D | tx.c | fc163831 Sun Oct 22 09:55:51 CDT 2023 Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> wifi: iwlwifi: empty overflow queue during flush
[ Upstream commit 658939fc68d3241f9a0019e224cd7154438c23f2 ]
If a TX queue has no space for new TX frames, the driver will keep
these frames in the overflow queue, and during reclaim flow it
will retry to send the frames from that queue.
But if the reclaim flow was invoked from TX queue flush, we will also
TX these frames, which is wrong as we don't want to TX anything
after flush.
This might also cause assert 0x125F when removing the queue,
saying that the driver removes a non-empty queue
Fix this by TXing the overflow queue's frames only if we are
not in flush queue flow.
Fixes: a44509805895 ("iwlwifi: move reclaim flows to the queue file")
Signed-off-by: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gregory Greenman <gregory.greenman@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231022173519.caf06c8709d9.Ibf664ccb3f952e836f8fa461ea58fc08e5c46e88@changeid
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|