Searched hist:fa7a0449 (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
/openbmc/linux/arch/um/include/shared/ |
H A D | irq_kern.h | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/um/drivers/ |
H A D | xterm_kern.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
H A D | port_kern.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
H A D | chan_kern.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
H A D | line.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
H A D | net_kern.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
/openbmc/linux/arch/um/kernel/ |
H A D | irq.c | fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq()
Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> fa7a0449 Tue Apr 17 15:37:13 CDT 2012 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> um: Implement um_free_irq() Instead of using chip->release() we can achieve the same using a simple wrapper for free_irq(). We have already um_request_irq(), so um_free_irq() is the perfect counterpart. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|