| /openbmc/linux/drivers/target/ |
| H A D | target_core_rd.c | f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
|
| H A D | target_core_file.c | f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
|
| H A D | target_core_sbc.c | f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
|
| H A D | target_core_transport.c | f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/target/ |
| H A D | target_core_backend.h | f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
f75b6fae Sun Apr 19 12:27:19 CDT 2015 Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com> target: Merge sbc_verify_dif_read|write
Instead of providing DIF verify routines for read/write
that are almost identical and conditionally copy protection
information, just let the caller do the right thing.
Have a single sbc_dif_verify that handles an sgl (that
does NOT copy any data) and a protection information copy
routine used by rd_mcp and fileio backend.
In the WRITE case, call sbc_dif_verify with cmd->t_prot_sg
and then do the copy from it to local sgl (assuming the verify
succeeded of course). In the READ case, call sbc_dif_verify
with the local sgl and if it succeeds, copy it to t_prot_sg (or
not if we are stripping it).
(Fix apply breakage from commit c836777 - nab)
Tested-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
|