Searched hist:f664f1f9 (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ufs/ |
| H A D | super.c | f664f1f9 Mon Oct 29 16:37:21 CDT 2007 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> revert "ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()"
Evgeniy said:
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch? NetBSD and FreeBSD
do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag, only Solaris does check
like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck, but NetBSD's fsck
says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
f664f1f9 Mon Oct 29 16:37:21 CDT 2007 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> revert "ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()"
Evgeniy said:
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch? NetBSD and FreeBSD
do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag, only Solaris does check
like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck, but NetBSD's fsck
says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|