Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:f419a08f (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/drivers/memstick/host/
H A Dr592.cf419a08f Fri Mar 25 16:21:47 CDT 2016 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> drivers/memstick/host/r592.c: avoid gcc-6 warning

The r592 driver relies on behavior of the DMA mapping API that is
normally observed but not guaranteed by the API. Instead it uses a
runtime check to fail transfers if the API ever behaves

When CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH is not set, one of the checks turns into a
comparison of a variable with itself, which gcc-6.0 now warns about:

drivers/memstick/host/r592.c: In function 'r592_transfer_fifo_dma':
drivers/memstick/host/r592.c:302:31: error: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Werror=tautological-compare]
(sg_dma_len(&dev->req->sg) < dev->req->sg.length)) {
^

The check itself is not a problem, so this patch just rephrases the
condition in a way that gcc does not consider an indication of a mistake.
We already know that dev->req->sg.length was initially R592_LFIFO_SIZE, so
we can compare it to that constant again.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
f419a08f Fri Mar 25 16:21:47 CDT 2016 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> drivers/memstick/host/r592.c: avoid gcc-6 warning

The r592 driver relies on behavior of the DMA mapping API that is
normally observed but not guaranteed by the API. Instead it uses a
runtime check to fail transfers if the API ever behaves

When CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH is not set, one of the checks turns into a
comparison of a variable with itself, which gcc-6.0 now warns about:

drivers/memstick/host/r592.c: In function 'r592_transfer_fifo_dma':
drivers/memstick/host/r592.c:302:31: error: self-comparison always evaluates to false [-Werror=tautological-compare]
(sg_dma_len(&dev->req->sg) < dev->req->sg.length)) {
^

The check itself is not a problem, so this patch just rephrases the
condition in a way that gcc does not consider an indication of a mistake.
We already know that dev->req->sg.length was initially R592_LFIFO_SIZE, so
we can compare it to that constant again.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Quentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>