Searched hist:ee72e0e7 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/riscv/include/asm/ |
| H A D | bug.h | ee72e0e7 Mon Mar 04 21:23:34 CST 2019 Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com> riscv: Add the support for c.ebreak check in is_valid_bugaddr()
The macro __BUG_INSN currently is defined as the "ebreak" opcode.
The is_valid_bugaddr() function compares the instruction pointed to by
$sepc with macro __BUG_INSN to check whether the current trap exception
is caused by an "ebreak" instruction. However, this check flow is possibly
erroneous because if C extension is supported, the expected trap
instruction "ebreak" is possibly translated to "c.ebreak" by the assembler.
Therefore, it requires a mechanism to distinguish the length of the
instruction in $spec and compare it to the correct trap instruction.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
ee72e0e7 Mon Mar 04 21:23:34 CST 2019 Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com> riscv: Add the support for c.ebreak check in is_valid_bugaddr()
The macro __BUG_INSN currently is defined as the "ebreak" opcode.
The is_valid_bugaddr() function compares the instruction pointed to by
$sepc with macro __BUG_INSN to check whether the current trap exception
is caused by an "ebreak" instruction. However, this check flow is possibly
erroneous because if C extension is supported, the expected trap
instruction "ebreak" is possibly translated to "c.ebreak" by the assembler.
Therefore, it requires a mechanism to distinguish the length of the
instruction in $spec and compare it to the correct trap instruction.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/riscv/kernel/ |
| H A D | traps.c | ee72e0e7 Mon Mar 04 21:23:34 CST 2019 Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com> riscv: Add the support for c.ebreak check in is_valid_bugaddr()
The macro __BUG_INSN currently is defined as the "ebreak" opcode.
The is_valid_bugaddr() function compares the instruction pointed to by
$sepc with macro __BUG_INSN to check whether the current trap exception
is caused by an "ebreak" instruction. However, this check flow is possibly
erroneous because if C extension is supported, the expected trap
instruction "ebreak" is possibly translated to "c.ebreak" by the assembler.
Therefore, it requires a mechanism to distinguish the length of the
instruction in $spec and compare it to the correct trap instruction.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
ee72e0e7 Mon Mar 04 21:23:34 CST 2019 Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com> riscv: Add the support for c.ebreak check in is_valid_bugaddr()
The macro __BUG_INSN currently is defined as the "ebreak" opcode.
The is_valid_bugaddr() function compares the instruction pointed to by
$sepc with macro __BUG_INSN to check whether the current trap exception
is caused by an "ebreak" instruction. However, this check flow is possibly
erroneous because if C extension is supported, the expected trap
instruction "ebreak" is possibly translated to "c.ebreak" by the assembler.
Therefore, it requires a mechanism to distinguish the length of the
instruction in $spec and compare it to the correct trap instruction.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincentc@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>
|