Searched hist:ee5b46a3 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | volumes.h | ee5b46a3 Tue Jun 21 01:26:27 CDT 2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: increase direct io read size limit to 256 sectors
Btrfs currently limits direct I/O reads to a single sector, which goes
back to commit c329861da406 ("Btrfs: don't allocate a separate csums
array for direct reads") from Josef. That commit changes the direct I/O
code to ".. use the private part of the io_tree for our csums.", but ten
years later that isn't how checksums for direct reads work, instead they
use a csums allocation on a per-btrfs_dio_private basis (which have their
own performance problem for small I/O, but that will be addressed later).
There is no fundamental limit in btrfs itself to limit the I/O size
except for the size of the checksum array that scales linearly with
the number of sectors in an I/O. Pick a somewhat arbitrary limit of
256 limits, which matches what the buffered reads typically see as
the upper limit as the limit for direct I/O as well.
This significantly improves direct read performance. For example a fio
run doing 1 MiB aio reads with a queue depth of 1 roughly triples the
throughput:
Baseline:
READ: bw=65.3MiB/s (68.5MB/s), 65.3MiB/s-65.3MiB/s (68.5MB/s-68.5MB/s), io=19.1GiB (20.6GB), run=300013-300013msec
With this patch:
READ: bw=196MiB/s (206MB/s), 196MiB/s-196MiB/s (206MB/s-206MB/s), io=57.5GiB (61.7GB), run=300006-300006msc
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | inode.c | ee5b46a3 Tue Jun 21 01:26:27 CDT 2022 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: increase direct io read size limit to 256 sectors
Btrfs currently limits direct I/O reads to a single sector, which goes
back to commit c329861da406 ("Btrfs: don't allocate a separate csums
array for direct reads") from Josef. That commit changes the direct I/O
code to ".. use the private part of the io_tree for our csums.", but ten
years later that isn't how checksums for direct reads work, instead they
use a csums allocation on a per-btrfs_dio_private basis (which have their
own performance problem for small I/O, but that will be addressed later).
There is no fundamental limit in btrfs itself to limit the I/O size
except for the size of the checksum array that scales linearly with
the number of sectors in an I/O. Pick a somewhat arbitrary limit of
256 limits, which matches what the buffered reads typically see as
the upper limit as the limit for direct I/O as well.
This significantly improves direct read performance. For example a fio
run doing 1 MiB aio reads with a queue depth of 1 roughly triples the
throughput:
Baseline:
READ: bw=65.3MiB/s (68.5MB/s), 65.3MiB/s-65.3MiB/s (68.5MB/s-68.5MB/s), io=19.1GiB (20.6GB), run=300013-300013msec
With this patch:
READ: bw=196MiB/s (206MB/s), 196MiB/s-196MiB/s (206MB/s-206MB/s), io=57.5GiB (61.7GB), run=300006-300006msc
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|