Searched hist:eb94cd68 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/misc/vmw_vmci/ |
| H A D | vmci_driver.c | eb94cd68 Thu Oct 06 06:43:08 CDT 2016 Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> VMCI: Doorbell create and destroy fixes
This change consists of two changes:
1) If vmci_doorbell_create is called when neither guest nor
host personality as been initialized, vmci_get_context_id
will return VMCI_INVALID_ID. In that case, we should fail
the create call.
2) In doorbell destroy, we assume that vmci_guest_code_active()
has the same return value on create and destroy. That may not
be the case, so we may end up with the wrong refcount.
Instead, destroy should check explicitly whether the doorbell
is in the index table as an indicator of whether the guest
code was active at create time.
Reviewed-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
eb94cd68 Thu Oct 06 06:43:08 CDT 2016 Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> VMCI: Doorbell create and destroy fixes
This change consists of two changes:
1) If vmci_doorbell_create is called when neither guest nor
host personality as been initialized, vmci_get_context_id
will return VMCI_INVALID_ID. In that case, we should fail
the create call.
2) In doorbell destroy, we assume that vmci_guest_code_active()
has the same return value on create and destroy. That may not
be the case, so we may end up with the wrong refcount.
Instead, destroy should check explicitly whether the doorbell
is in the index table as an indicator of whether the guest
code was active at create time.
Reviewed-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| H A D | vmci_doorbell.c | eb94cd68 Thu Oct 06 06:43:08 CDT 2016 Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> VMCI: Doorbell create and destroy fixes
This change consists of two changes:
1) If vmci_doorbell_create is called when neither guest nor
host personality as been initialized, vmci_get_context_id
will return VMCI_INVALID_ID. In that case, we should fail
the create call.
2) In doorbell destroy, we assume that vmci_guest_code_active()
has the same return value on create and destroy. That may not
be the case, so we may end up with the wrong refcount.
Instead, destroy should check explicitly whether the doorbell
is in the index table as an indicator of whether the guest
code was active at create time.
Reviewed-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
eb94cd68 Thu Oct 06 06:43:08 CDT 2016 Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> VMCI: Doorbell create and destroy fixes
This change consists of two changes:
1) If vmci_doorbell_create is called when neither guest nor
host personality as been initialized, vmci_get_context_id
will return VMCI_INVALID_ID. In that case, we should fail
the create call.
2) In doorbell destroy, we assume that vmci_guest_code_active()
has the same return value on create and destroy. That may not
be the case, so we may end up with the wrong refcount.
Instead, destroy should check explicitly whether the doorbell
is in the index table as an indicator of whether the guest
code was active at create time.
Reviewed-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|