Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:eaa47d86 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/
H A Dxattr.heaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
eaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
H A Dacl.ceaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
eaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
H A Dxattr.ceaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
eaa47d86 Thu Aug 28 05:21:16 CDT 2008 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> btrfs: optmize listxattr

The ->list handler is really not useful at all, because we always call
btrfs_xattr_generic_list anyway. After this is done
find_btrfs_xattr_handler becomes unused, and it becomes obvious that the
temporary name buffer allocation isn't needed but we can directly copy
into the supplied buffer.

Tested with various getfattr -d calls on varying xattr lists.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>