| /openbmc/linux/fs/ |
| H A D | sync.c | e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | fs-writeback.c | 7c8a3554 Tue May 18 07:29:29 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: ensure that WB_SYNC_NONE writeback with sb pinned is sync
Even if the writeout itself isn't a data integrity operation, we need
to ensure that the caller doesn't drop the sb umount sem before we
have actually done the writeback.
This is a fixup for commit e913fc82.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
7c8a3554 Tue May 18 07:29:29 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: ensure that WB_SYNC_NONE writeback with sb pinned is sync
Even if the writeout itself isn't a data integrity operation, we need
to ensure that the caller doesn't drop the sb umount sem before we
have actually done the writeback.
This is a fixup for commit e913fc82.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | writeback.h | e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | backing-dev.h | e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/mm/ |
| H A D | page-writeback.c | e913fc82 Mon May 17 05:55:07 CDT 2010 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writeback: fix WB_SYNC_NONE writeback from umount
When umount calls sync_filesystem(), we first do a WB_SYNC_NONE
writeback to kick off writeback of pending dirty inodes, then follow
that up with a WB_SYNC_ALL to wait for it. Since umount already holds
the sb s_umount mutex, WB_SYNC_NONE ends up doing nothing and all
writeback happens as WB_SYNC_ALL. This can greatly slow down umount,
since WB_SYNC_ALL writeback is a data integrity operation and thus
a bigger hammer than simple WB_SYNC_NONE. For barrier aware file systems
it's a lot slower.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
|