| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | print-tree.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | file-item.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | send.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | tree-log.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | file.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | ctree.h | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| H A D | inode.c | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/trace/events/ |
| H A D | btrfs.h | e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
e41ca589 Wed Jun 06 02:41:49 CDT 2018 Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> btrfs: Get rid of the confusing btrfs_file_extent_inline_len
We used to call btrfs_file_extent_inline_len() to get the uncompressed
data size of an inlined extent.
However this function is hiding evil, for compressed extent, it has no
choice but to directly read out ram_bytes from btrfs_file_extent_item.
While for uncompressed extent, it uses item size to calculate the real
data size, and ignoring ram_bytes completely.
In fact, for corrupted ram_bytes, due to above behavior kernel
btrfs_print_leaf() can't even print correct ram_bytes to expose the bug.
Since we have the tree-checker to verify all EXTENT_DATA, such mismatch
can be detected pretty easily, thus we can trust ram_bytes without the
evil btrfs_file_extent_inline_len().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|