| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | configfs.h | e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/usb/gadget/function/ |
| H A D | uvc_configfs.c | e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/target/ |
| H A D | target_core_fabric_configfs.c | e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/nvme/target/ |
| H A D | configfs.c | e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/usb/gadget/ |
| H A D | configfs.c | e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
e16769d4 Mon Nov 28 06:22:42 CST 2016 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com> fs: configfs: don't return anything from drop_link
Documentation/filesystems/configfs/configfs.txt says:
"When unlink(2) is called on the symbolic link, the source item is
notified via the ->drop_link() method. Like the ->drop_item() method,
this is a void function and cannot return failure."
The ->drop_item() is indeed a void function, the ->drop_link() is
actually not. This, together with the fact that the value of ->drop_link()
is silently ignored suggests, that it is the ->drop_link() return
type that should be corrected and changed to void.
This patch changes drop_link() signature and all its users.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
[hch: reverted reformatting of some code]
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
|