Searched hist:df9f2782 (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/btrfs/ |
| H A D | transaction.c | df9f2782 Tue Jun 13 10:42:16 CDT 2023 Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> btrfs: do not BUG_ON on failure to get dir index for new snapshot
During the transaction commit path, at create_pending_snapshot(), there
is no need to BUG_ON() in case we fail to get a dir index for the snapshot
in the parent directory. This should fail very rarely because the parent
inode should be loaded in memory already, with the respective delayed
inode created and the parent inode's index_cnt field already initialized.
However if it fails, it may be -ENOMEM like the comment at
create_pending_snapshot() says or any error returned by
btrfs_search_slot() through btrfs_set_inode_index_count(), which can be
pretty much anything such as -EIO or -EUCLEAN for example. So the comment
is not correct when it says it can only be -ENOMEM.
However doing a BUG_ON() here is overkill, since we can instead abort
the transaction and return the error. Note that any error returned by
create_pending_snapshot() will eventually result in a transaction
abort at cleanup_transaction(), called from btrfs_commit_transaction(),
but we can explicitly abort the transaction at this point instead so that
we get a stack trace to tell us that the call to btrfs_set_inode_index()
failed.
So just abort the transaction and return in case btrfs_set_inode_index()
returned an error at create_pending_snapshot().
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
|