Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:dda5f312 (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/arch/arm/lib/
H A Dtestchangebit.Sdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
H A Dtestclearbit.Sdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
H A Dtestsetbit.Sdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
H A Dbitops.hdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
/openbmc/linux/arch/arm/include/asm/
H A Dsync_bitops.hdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com
H A Dassembler.hdda5f312 Mon Jun 05 02:00:58 CDT 2023 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> locking/atomic: arm: fix sync ops

The sync_*() ops on arch/arm are defined in terms of the regular bitops
with no special handling. This is not correct, as UP kernels elide
barriers for the fully-ordered operations, and so the required ordering
is lost when such UP kernels are run under a hypervsior on an SMP
system.

Fix this by defining sync ops with the required barriers.

Note: On 32-bit arm, the sync_*() ops are currently only used by Xen,
which requires ARMv7, but the semantics can be implemented for ARMv6+.

Fixes: e54d2f61528165bb ("xen/arm: sync_bitops")
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605070124.3741859-2-mark.rutland@arm.com