Searched hist:d7d4eedd (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/drm/ |
| H A D | i915_drm.h | d7d4eedd Wed Oct 17 06:09:54 CDT 2012 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Allow DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers
With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.
v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ |
| H A D | i915_trace.h | d7d4eedd Wed Oct 17 06:09:54 CDT 2012 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Allow DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers
With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.
v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
d7d4eedd Wed Oct 17 06:09:54 CDT 2012 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Allow DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers
With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.
v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| H A D | i915_reg.h | d7d4eedd Wed Oct 17 06:09:54 CDT 2012 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Allow DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers
With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.
v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
d7d4eedd Wed Oct 17 06:09:54 CDT 2012 Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> drm/i915: Allow DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER to submit privileged batchbuffers
With the introduction of per-process GTT space, the hardware designers
thought it wise to also limit the ability to write to MMIO space to only
a "secure" batch buffer. The ability to rewrite registers is the only
way to program the hardware to perform certain operations like scanline
waits (required for tear-free windowed updates). So we either have a
choice of adding an interface to perform those synchronized updates
inside the kernel, or we permit certain processes the ability to write
to the "safe" registers from within its command stream. This patch
exposes the ability to submit a SECURE batch buffer to
DRM_ROOT_ONLY|DRM_MASTER processes.
v2: Haswell split up bit8 into a ppgtt bit (still bit8) and a security
bit (bit 13, accidentally not set). Also add a comment explaining why
secure batches need a global gtt binding.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v1)
[danvet: added hsw fixup.]
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|