Searched hist:d3ec5cae (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/kernel/ |
| H A D | smp.c | d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| H A D | reboot.c | d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| H A D | process.c | d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/ |
| H A D | apic.h | d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
d3ec5cae Tue Nov 11 07:33:44 CST 2008 Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com> x86: call machine_shutdown and stop all CPUs in native_machine_halt
Impact: really halt all CPUs on halt
Function machine_halt (resp. native_machine_halt) is empty for x86
architectures. When command 'halt -f' is invoked, the message "System
halted." is displayed but this is not really true because all CPUs are
still running.
There are also similar inconsistencies for other arches (some uses
power-off for halt or forever-loop with IRQs enabled/disabled).
IMO there should be used the same approach for all architectures OR
what does the message "System halted" really mean?
This patch fixes it for x86.
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|