Searched hist:d24f2d32 (Results 1 – 9 of 9) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/u-boot/include/configs/ |
| H A D | edb93xx.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | astro_mcf5373l.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | vme8349.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | MPC8315ERDB.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | sbc8548.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | sbc8349.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | MPC8569MDS.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | MPC8572DS.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
| H A D | MPC8536DS.h | d24f2d32 Mon Oct 04 12:58:00 CDT 2010 Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de> mkconfig: change CONFIG_MK_ prefix into plain CONFIG_
When planning for more generalization and Makefile cleanup it became
obvious that the introduction of a separate CONFIG_MK_ name space for
config options that were set through scripting in the Makefile was
not a good idea.
Originally the idea was to provide a script-free approach to supply
configuration options - there was no real need for a separate name
space. But when we now convert the existing Makefile entries to make
use of this approach, it would mean that we have to touch a large
number of board config files and add #ifdef / #define sequences to
"convert" from the CONFIG_MK_ to the CONFIG_ name space.
It seems much cleaner to get rid of this somewhat arbitrary _MK
string now for the few boards that actually use it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|