Searched hist:d15f9d69 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/net/ceph/ |
| H A D | messenger.c | d15f9d69 Wed Sep 02 03:37:09 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message
against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not
right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg
which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it
returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to
an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the
skip/no-skip decision.
I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now,
if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are
prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip
it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()),
so this also fixes a memory leak.
An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't
corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit
ceph_msg.
While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make
sure all skips are seen and unified format strings.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
d15f9d69 Wed Sep 02 03:37:09 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message
against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not
right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg
which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it
returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to
an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the
skip/no-skip decision.
I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now,
if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are
prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip
it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()),
so this also fixes a memory leak.
An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't
corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit
ceph_msg.
While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make
sure all skips are seen and unified format strings.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | osd_client.c | d15f9d69 Wed Sep 02 03:37:09 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message
against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not
right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg
which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it
returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to
an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the
skip/no-skip decision.
I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now,
if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are
prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip
it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()),
so this also fixes a memory leak.
An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't
corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit
ceph_msg.
While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make
sure all skips are seen and unified format strings.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
d15f9d69 Wed Sep 02 03:37:09 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message
against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not
right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg
which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it
returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to
an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the
skip/no-skip decision.
I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now,
if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are
prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip
it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()),
so this also fixes a memory leak.
An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't
corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit
ceph_msg.
While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make
sure all skips are seen and unified format strings.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
|