| /openbmc/linux/include/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi_host.h | cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
|
| H A D | scsi_device.h | cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/ |
| H A D | scsi.c | cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
|
| H A D | scsi_sysfs.c | cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
|
| H A D | scsi_lib.c | cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
cd9070c9 Thu Jan 23 05:07:41 CST 2014 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> scsi: fix the {host,target,device}_blocked counter mess
Seems like these counters are missing any sort of synchronization for
updates, as a over 10 year old comment from me noted. Fix this by
using atomic counters, and while we're at it also make sure they are
in the same cacheline as the _busy counters and not needlessly stored
to in every I/O completion.
With the new model the _busy counters can temporarily go negative,
so all the readers are updated to check for > 0 values. Longer
term every successful I/O completion will reset the counters to zero,
so the temporarily negative values will not cause any harm.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Webb Scales <webbnh@hp.com>
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Tested-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@hp.com>
|