| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-pxa/ |
| H A D | sharpsl_pm.h | ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
|
| H A D | spitz_pm.c | ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
|
| H A D | sharpsl_pm.c | ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
ca26475b Mon Aug 01 17:01:32 CDT 2016 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> ARM: pxa: fix GPIO double shifts
The commit 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register") from Oct 17, 2011, leads to the following static checker
warning:
arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz_pm.c:172 spitz_charger_wakeup()
warn: double left shift '!gpio_get_value(SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT)
<< (1 << ((SPITZ_GPIO_KEY_INT) & 31))'
As Dan reported, the value is shifted three times :
- once by gpio_get_value(), which returns either 0 or BIT(gpio)
- once by the shift operation '<<'
- a last time by GPIO_bit(gpio) which is BIT(gpio)
Therefore the calculation lead to a chained or operator of :
- (1 << gpio) << (1 << gpio) = (2^gpio)^gpio = 2 ^ (gpio * gpio)
It is be sheer luck the former statement works, only because each gpio
used is strictly smaller than 6, and therefore 2^(gpio^2) never
overflows a 32 bits value, and because it is used as a boolean value to
check a gpio activation.
As the xxx_charger_wakeup() functions are used as a true/false detection
mechanism, take that opportunity to change their prototypes from integer
return value to boolean one.
Fixes: 9bf448c66d4b ("ARM: pxa: use generic gpio operation instead of
gpio register")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
|