Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:c6d48134 (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/
H A Dem28xx-audio.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx-input.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx-core.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx-dvb.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx.hc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx-cards.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
H A Dem28xx-video.cc6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
c6d48134 Wed Dec 07 10:34:22 CST 2016 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com> [media] em28xx: don't store usb_device at struct em28xx

Now that we're storing usb_interface at em28xx struct,
there's no good reason to keep storing usb_device, as we can
get it from usb_interface. So, get rid of it.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>