| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ |
| H A D | msm8916-mtp.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | apq8039-t2.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8939-sony-xperia-kanuti-tulip.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-samsung-gt5-common.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-ufi.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-samsung-j5-common.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-acer-a1-724.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-gplus-fl8005a.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-wingtech-wt88047.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-longcheer-l8910.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-asus-z00l.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-alcatel-idol347.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8939.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-samsung-serranove.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-huawei-g7.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | apq8016-sbc.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-longcheer-l8150.dts | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916-samsung-a2015-common.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|
| H A D | msm8916.dtsi | c310ca82 Mon May 29 07:46:59 CDT 2023 Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net> arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN
For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.
Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').
End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net
|