Searched hist:c043dee9 (Results 1 – 8 of 8) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/ |
| H A D | rk3399-rock-pi-4b.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-rock-pi-4c.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-leez-p710.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-khadas-edge.dtsi | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-hugsun-x99.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-rock960.dtsi | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-orangepi.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|
| H A D | rk3399-firefly.dts | c043dee9 Thu Sep 17 13:52:11 CDT 2020 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> arm64: dts: rockchip: correct interrupt flags on rk3399 boards
GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
have the same meaning:
1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
ACTIVE_HIGH => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917185211.5483-2-krzk@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
|