Searched hist:bfcba38d (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/media/i2c/ |
| H A D | ov5640.c | bfcba38d Wed Mar 25 07:20:00 CDT 2020 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> media: ov5640: fix use of destroyed mutex
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() uses hdl->lock, which in ov5640 driver is set
to sensor's own sensor->lock. In ov5640_remove(), the driver destroys the
sensor->lock first, and then calls v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), resulting
in the use of the destroyed mutex.
Fix this by calling moving the mutex_destroy() to the end of the cleanup
sequence, as there's no need to destroy the mutex as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+
Reviewed-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
bfcba38d Wed Mar 25 07:20:00 CDT 2020 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> media: ov5640: fix use of destroyed mutex
v4l2_ctrl_handler_free() uses hdl->lock, which in ov5640 driver is set
to sensor's own sensor->lock. In ov5640_remove(), the driver destroys the
sensor->lock first, and then calls v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), resulting
in the use of the destroyed mutex.
Fix this by calling moving the mutex_destroy() to the end of the cleanup
sequence, as there's no need to destroy the mutex as early as possible.
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.14+
Reviewed-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
|