Searched hist:be0c94ee (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/ |
| H A D | intel_drrs.c | be0c94ee Fri Jan 28 04:37:44 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Split intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into M1/N1 vs. M2/N2 variants
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
| H A D | intel_display.h | be0c94ee Fri Jan 28 04:37:44 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Split intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into M1/N1 vs. M2/N2 variants
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
| H A D | intel_dp_mst.c | be0c94ee Fri Jan 28 04:37:44 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Split intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into M1/N1 vs. M2/N2 variants
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
| H A D | intel_ddi.c | be0c94ee Fri Jan 28 04:37:44 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Split intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into M1/N1 vs. M2/N2 variants
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|
| H A D | intel_display.c | be0c94ee Fri Jan 28 04:37:44 CST 2022 Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Split intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into M1/N1 vs. M2/N2 variants
Make things a bit more explicit by splitting
intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m_n() into separate variants for M1/N1 vs.
M2/N2. Makes the DRRS M/N programming at least more obvious.
Note that for the MST and DRRS cases we don't need to call the
M2/N2 variant at all since the transcoders that support those
do not have the M2/N2 registers.
Same could be said for i9xx_crtc_enable() but I want to do a
higher level code sharing between that valleyview_crtc_enable()
later in which case we do need the M2/N2 variant. This is also
why I keep the transcoder_has_m2_n2() in intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2()
so the caller doesn't have necessarily care what the chosen
transcoder supports.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220128103757.22461-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
|