"bc98a42c" (history) in projects: openbmc

Searched hist:bc98a42c (Results 1 – 25 of 71) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/fs/jfs/
H A D	jfs_mount.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/sysv/
H A D	balloc.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	ialloc.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	super.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	inode.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/hfs/
H A D	mdb.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	super.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/hpfs/
H A D	alloc.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	dir.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	super.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/affs/
H A D	bitmap.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	amigaffs.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/reiserfs/
H A D	prints.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/xfs/
H A D	xfs_quotaops.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/fat/
H A D	fatent.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	misc.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/ext4/
H A D	mmp.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	ext4_jbd2.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
H A D	fsync.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/
H A D	proc_namespace.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/efs/
H A D	super.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/nilfs2/
H A D	mdt.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/quota/
H A D	quota.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/jffs2/
H A D	wbuf.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
/openbmc/linux/fs/ntfs/
H A D	super.c	bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> bc98a42c Mon Jul 17 02:45:34 CDT 2017 David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch: @@ expression SB; @@ -SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY +sb_rdonly(SB) to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +!sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -A != (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A == (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A == sb_rdonly(SB) \| -!(sb_rdonly(SB)) +!sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A && (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A && sb_rdonly(SB) \| -A \|\| (sb_rdonly(SB)) +A \|\| sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A +sb_rdonly(SB) != A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A +sb_rdonly(SB) == A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A +sb_rdonly(SB) && A \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) \|\| A +sb_rdonly(SB) \|\| A ) @@ expression A, B, SB; @@ ( -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0 +sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B +sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B ) to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying: @@ expression A, SB; @@ ( -(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB) \| -(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) +(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB) ) to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool) work correctly. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

12 3

Project(s)

Full Search
Definition
Symbol
File Path
History
Type