| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/include/asm/ |
| H A D | unwind_hints.h | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | objtool.h | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/kernel/ |
| H A D | ftrace_64.S | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/tools/objtool/include/objtool/ |
| H A D | check.h | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/tools/objtool/arch/x86/ |
| H A D | decode.c | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/x86/lib/ |
| H A D | retpoline.S | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|
| /openbmc/linux/tools/objtool/ |
| H A D | check.c | b735bd3e Thu Jan 21 15:29:24 CST 2021 Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> objtool: Combine UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET and UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
The ORC metadata generated for UNWIND_HINT_FUNC isn't actually very
func-like. With certain usages it can cause stack state mismatches
because it doesn't set the return address (CFI_RA).
Also, users of UNWIND_HINT_RET_OFFSET no longer need to set a custom
return stack offset. Instead they just need to specify a func-like
situation, so the current ret_offset code is hacky for no good reason.
Solve both problems by simplifying the RET_OFFSET handling and
converting it into a more useful UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
If we end up needing the old 'ret_offset' functionality again in the
future, we should be able to support it pretty easily with the addition
of a custom 'sp_offset' in UNWIND_HINT_FUNC.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db9d1f5d79dddfbb3725ef6d8ec3477ad199948d.1611263462.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
|