Home
last modified time | relevance | path

Searched hist:b7169dde (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance

/openbmc/linux/sound/soc/sh/rcar/
H A Dctu.cb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
H A Dgen.cb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
H A Dadg.cb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
H A Dssiu.cb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
H A Ddvc.cb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
H A Drsnd.hb7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
b7169dde Wed Dec 12 01:03:58 CST 2018 Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> ASoC: rsnd: remove RSND_REG_ from rsnd_reg

Current rsnd is using RSND_REG_xxx for register naming,
and using RSND_REG_##f style macro for read/write.
The biggest reason why it uses this style is that
we can avoid non-existing register access.
But, its demerit is sequential register access code will
be very ugly.
Current rsnd driver is well tested, so, let's remove RSND_REG_
from rsnd_reg, and cleanup sequential register access code.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hiroyuki Yokoyama <hiroyuki.yokoyama.vx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>