Searched hist:b18b9550 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ceph/ |
| H A D | osd_client.h | b18b9550 Sat Feb 11 11:46:08 CST 2017 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: get rid of ack vs commit
- CEPH_OSD_FLAG_ACK shouldn't be set anymore, so assert on it
- remove support for handling ack replies (OSDs will send ack replies
only if clients request them)
- drop the "do lingering callbacks under osd->lock" logic from
handle_reply() -- lreq->lock is sufficient in all three cases
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
b18b9550 Sat Feb 11 11:46:08 CST 2017 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: get rid of ack vs commit
- CEPH_OSD_FLAG_ACK shouldn't be set anymore, so assert on it
- remove support for handling ack replies (OSDs will send ack replies
only if clients request them)
- drop the "do lingering callbacks under osd->lock" logic from
handle_reply() -- lreq->lock is sufficient in all three cases
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ceph/ |
| H A D | osd_client.c | b18b9550 Sat Feb 11 11:46:08 CST 2017 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: get rid of ack vs commit
- CEPH_OSD_FLAG_ACK shouldn't be set anymore, so assert on it
- remove support for handling ack replies (OSDs will send ack replies
only if clients request them)
- drop the "do lingering callbacks under osd->lock" logic from
handle_reply() -- lreq->lock is sufficient in all three cases
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
b18b9550 Sat Feb 11 11:46:08 CST 2017 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: get rid of ack vs commit
- CEPH_OSD_FLAG_ACK shouldn't be set anymore, so assert on it
- remove support for handling ack replies (OSDs will send ack replies
only if clients request them)
- drop the "do lingering callbacks under osd->lock" logic from
handle_reply() -- lreq->lock is sufficient in all three cases
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
|