Searched hist:b04f50ab (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/block/ |
| H A D | blk-mq-sched.c | b04f50ab Mon Jul 02 04:35:59 CDT 2018 Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> blk-mq: only attempt to merge bio if there is rq in sw queue
Only attempt to merge bio iff the ctx->rq_list isn't empty, because:
1) for high-performance SSD, most of times dispatch may succeed, then
there may be nothing left in ctx->rq_list, so don't try to merge over
sw queue if it is empty, then we can save one acquiring of ctx->lock
2) we can't expect good merge performance on per-cpu sw queue, and missing
one merge on sw queue won't be a big deal since tasks can be scheduled from
one CPU to another.
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Reported-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
b04f50ab Mon Jul 02 04:35:59 CDT 2018 Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> blk-mq: only attempt to merge bio if there is rq in sw queue
Only attempt to merge bio iff the ctx->rq_list isn't empty, because:
1) for high-performance SSD, most of times dispatch may succeed, then
there may be nothing left in ctx->rq_list, so don't try to merge over
sw queue if it is empty, then we can save one acquiring of ctx->lock
2) we can't expect good merge performance on per-cpu sw queue, and missing
one merge on sw queue won't be a big deal since tasks can be scheduled from
one CPU to another.
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Reported-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|