Searched hist:abf832bf (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/hid/ |
| H A D | hid-zydacron.c | abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | hid-a4tech.c | abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | hid-magicmouse.c | abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | hid-apple.c | abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|
| H A D | hid-sony.c | abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
abf832bf Wed Jul 24 12:38:04 CDT 2013 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> HID: trivial devm conversion for special hid drivers
It is safe to use devres allocation within the hid subsystem:
- the devres release is called _after_ the call to .remove(), meaning
that no freed pointers will exists while removing the device
- if a .probe() fails, devres releases all the allocated ressources
before going to the next driver: there will not be ghost ressources
attached to a hid device if several drivers are probed.
Given that, we can clean up a little some of the HID drivers. These ones
are trivial:
- there is only one kzalloc in the driver
- the .remove() callback contains only one kfree on top of hid_hw_stop()
- the error path in the probe is easy enough to be manually checked
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
|