Searched hist:abd2f577 (Results 1 – 6 of 6) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/ |
| H A D | i915_gem_phys.c | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_gem_shrinker.c | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_gem_pages.c | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_gem_userptr.c | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_gem_object.h | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|
| H A D | i915_gem_object.c | abd2f577 Tue Mar 23 10:50:06 CDT 2021 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> drm/i915: Flatten obj->mm.lock
With userptr fixed, there is no need for all separate lockdep classes
now, and we can remove all lockdep tricks used. A trylock in the
shrinker is all we need now to flatten the locking hierarchy.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
[danvet: Resolve conflict because we don't have the patch from Chris
to rebrand i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex to fs_reclaim_taints_mutex.
It's not a bad idea, but if we do it, it should be moved to the right
header. See
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/20210202154318.19246-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk/]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210323155059.628690-18-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
|