Searched hist:a52c2584 (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/include/asm/ |
| H A D | uv.h | a52c2584 Tue Jun 28 08:56:03 CDT 2022 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations for protected guests
A secure storage violation is triggered when a protected guest tries to
access secure memory that has been mapped erroneously, or that belongs
to a different protected guest or to the ultravisor.
With upcoming patches, protected guests will be able to trigger secure
storage violations in normal operation. This happens for example if a
protected guest is rebooted with deferred destroy enabled and the new
guest is also protected.
When the new protected guest touches pages that have not yet been
destroyed, and thus are accounted to the previous protected guest, a
secure storage violation is raised.
This patch adds handling of secure storage violations for protected
guests.
This exception is handled by first trying to destroy the page, because
it is expected to belong to a defunct protected guest where a destroy
should be possible. Note that a secure page can only be destroyed if
its protected VM does not have any CPUs, which only happens when the
protected VM is being terminated. If that fails, a normal export of
the page is attempted.
This means that pages that trigger the exception will be made
non-secure (in one way or another) before attempting to use them again
for a different secure guest.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/kernel/ |
| H A D | uv.c | a52c2584 Tue Jun 28 08:56:03 CDT 2022 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations for protected guests
A secure storage violation is triggered when a protected guest tries to
access secure memory that has been mapped erroneously, or that belongs
to a different protected guest or to the ultravisor.
With upcoming patches, protected guests will be able to trigger secure
storage violations in normal operation. This happens for example if a
protected guest is rebooted with deferred destroy enabled and the new
guest is also protected.
When the new protected guest touches pages that have not yet been
destroyed, and thus are accounted to the previous protected guest, a
secure storage violation is raised.
This patch adds handling of secure storage violations for protected
guests.
This exception is handled by first trying to destroy the page, because
it is expected to belong to a defunct protected guest where a destroy
should be possible. Note that a secure page can only be destroyed if
its protected VM does not have any CPUs, which only happens when the
protected VM is being terminated. If that fails, a normal export of
the page is attempted.
This means that pages that trigger the exception will be made
non-secure (in one way or another) before attempting to use them again
for a different secure guest.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/s390/mm/ |
| H A D | fault.c | a52c2584 Tue Jun 28 08:56:03 CDT 2022 Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> KVM: s390: pv: handle secure storage violations for protected guests
A secure storage violation is triggered when a protected guest tries to
access secure memory that has been mapped erroneously, or that belongs
to a different protected guest or to the ultravisor.
With upcoming patches, protected guests will be able to trigger secure
storage violations in normal operation. This happens for example if a
protected guest is rebooted with deferred destroy enabled and the new
guest is also protected.
When the new protected guest touches pages that have not yet been
destroyed, and thus are accounted to the previous protected guest, a
secure storage violation is raised.
This patch adds handling of secure storage violations for protected
guests.
This exception is handled by first trying to destroy the page, because
it is expected to belong to a defunct protected guest where a destroy
should be possible. Note that a secure page can only be destroyed if
its protected VM does not have any CPUs, which only happens when the
protected VM is being terminated. If that fails, a normal export of
the page is attempted.
This means that pages that trigger the exception will be made
non-secure (in one way or another) before attempting to use them again
for a different secure guest.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Message-Id: <20220628135619.32410-3-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
|