Searched hist:a0a8bcf4 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/gpio/ |
| H A D | driver.h | a0a8bcf4 Mon Aug 17 07:35:23 CDT 2015 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> gpiolib: irqchip: use different lockdep class for each gpio irqchip
Since IRQ chip helpers were introduced drivers lose ability to
register separate lockdep classes for each registered GPIO IRQ
chip and the gpiolib now is using shared lockdep class for
all GPIO IRQ chips (gpiochip_irq_lock_class).
As result, lockdep will produce warning when there are min two
stacked GPIO chips and all of them are interrupt controllers.
HW configuration which generates lockdep warning (TI dra7-evm):
[SOC GPIO bankA.gpioX]
<- irq - [pcf875x.gpioY]
<- irq - DevZ.enable_irq_wake(pcf_gpioY_irq);
The issue was reported in [1] and discussed [2].
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
sh/63 is trying to acquire lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
but task is already holding lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(class);
lock(class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by sh/63:
#0: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<c016bbb8>] vfs_write+0x13c/0x164
#1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01debf4>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1a0
#2: (s_active#36){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01debfc>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1a0
#3: (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009758c>] pm_suspend+0xec/0x4c4
#4: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c03f77f8>] __device_suspend+0xd4/0x398
#5: (&gpio->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009b940>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x74/0x94
#6: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55
Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0016e24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013338>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0013338>] (show_stack) from [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
[<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack) from [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire+0x19c0/0x1e20)
[<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire+0xa8/0x128)
[<c0091098>] (lock_acquire) from [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x4c)
[<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94)
[<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xfc)
[<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake+0x24/0x54)
[<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake) from [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xfc)
[<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x70/0xd4)
[<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback+0x50/0x124)
[<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend+0x10c/0x398)
[<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend) from [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend+0x134/0x2f4)
[<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend) from [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0xa8/0x728)
[<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend+0x32c/0x4c4)
[<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0096060>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8)
[<c0096060>] (state_store) from [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0)
[<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xd8)
[<c016b280>] (__vfs_write) from [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164)
[<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write) from [<c016c330>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
[<c016c330>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f500>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
Lets fix it by using separate lockdep class for each registered GPIO
IRQ Chip. This is done by wrapping gpiochip_irqchip_add call into macros.
The implementation of this patch inspired by solution done by Nicolas
Boichat for regmap [3]
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg05844.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg06021.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg429834.html
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Reported-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
a0a8bcf4 Mon Aug 17 07:35:23 CDT 2015 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> gpiolib: irqchip: use different lockdep class for each gpio irqchip
Since IRQ chip helpers were introduced drivers lose ability to
register separate lockdep classes for each registered GPIO IRQ
chip and the gpiolib now is using shared lockdep class for
all GPIO IRQ chips (gpiochip_irq_lock_class).
As result, lockdep will produce warning when there are min two
stacked GPIO chips and all of them are interrupt controllers.
HW configuration which generates lockdep warning (TI dra7-evm):
[SOC GPIO bankA.gpioX]
<- irq - [pcf875x.gpioY]
<- irq - DevZ.enable_irq_wake(pcf_gpioY_irq);
The issue was reported in [1] and discussed [2].
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
sh/63 is trying to acquire lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
but task is already holding lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(class);
lock(class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by sh/63:
#0: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<c016bbb8>] vfs_write+0x13c/0x164
#1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01debf4>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1a0
#2: (s_active#36){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01debfc>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1a0
#3: (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009758c>] pm_suspend+0xec/0x4c4
#4: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c03f77f8>] __device_suspend+0xd4/0x398
#5: (&gpio->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009b940>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x74/0x94
#6: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55
Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0016e24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013338>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0013338>] (show_stack) from [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
[<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack) from [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire+0x19c0/0x1e20)
[<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire+0xa8/0x128)
[<c0091098>] (lock_acquire) from [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x4c)
[<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94)
[<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xfc)
[<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake+0x24/0x54)
[<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake) from [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xfc)
[<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x70/0xd4)
[<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback+0x50/0x124)
[<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend+0x10c/0x398)
[<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend) from [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend+0x134/0x2f4)
[<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend) from [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0xa8/0x728)
[<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend+0x32c/0x4c4)
[<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0096060>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8)
[<c0096060>] (state_store) from [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0)
[<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xd8)
[<c016b280>] (__vfs_write) from [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164)
[<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write) from [<c016c330>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
[<c016c330>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f500>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
Lets fix it by using separate lockdep class for each registered GPIO
IRQ Chip. This is done by wrapping gpiochip_irqchip_add call into macros.
The implementation of this patch inspired by solution done by Nicolas
Boichat for regmap [3]
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg05844.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg06021.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg429834.html
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Reported-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/gpio/ |
| H A D | gpiolib.c | a0a8bcf4 Mon Aug 17 07:35:23 CDT 2015 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> gpiolib: irqchip: use different lockdep class for each gpio irqchip
Since IRQ chip helpers were introduced drivers lose ability to
register separate lockdep classes for each registered GPIO IRQ
chip and the gpiolib now is using shared lockdep class for
all GPIO IRQ chips (gpiochip_irq_lock_class).
As result, lockdep will produce warning when there are min two
stacked GPIO chips and all of them are interrupt controllers.
HW configuration which generates lockdep warning (TI dra7-evm):
[SOC GPIO bankA.gpioX]
<- irq - [pcf875x.gpioY]
<- irq - DevZ.enable_irq_wake(pcf_gpioY_irq);
The issue was reported in [1] and discussed [2].
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
sh/63 is trying to acquire lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
but task is already holding lock:
(class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(class);
lock(class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
7 locks held by sh/63:
#0: (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<c016bbb8>] vfs_write+0x13c/0x164
#1: (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01debf4>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1a0
#2: (s_active#36){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01debfc>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1a0
#3: (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009758c>] pm_suspend+0xec/0x4c4
#4: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c03f77f8>] __device_suspend+0xd4/0x398
#5: (&gpio->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009b940>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x74/0x94
#6: (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55
Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
[<c0016e24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013338>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c0013338>] (show_stack) from [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
[<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack) from [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire+0x19c0/0x1e20)
[<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire+0xa8/0x128)
[<c0091098>] (lock_acquire) from [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x4c)
[<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94)
[<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xfc)
[<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake+0x24/0x54)
[<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake) from [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xfc)
[<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x70/0xd4)
[<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback+0x50/0x124)
[<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend+0x10c/0x398)
[<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend) from [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend+0x134/0x2f4)
[<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend) from [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0xa8/0x728)
[<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend+0x32c/0x4c4)
[<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0096060>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8)
[<c0096060>] (state_store) from [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0)
[<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xd8)
[<c016b280>] (__vfs_write) from [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164)
[<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write) from [<c016c330>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
[<c016c330>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f500>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
Lets fix it by using separate lockdep class for each registered GPIO
IRQ Chip. This is done by wrapping gpiochip_irqchip_add call into macros.
The implementation of this patch inspired by solution done by Nicolas
Boichat for regmap [3]
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg05844.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg06021.html
[3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg429834.html
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Reported-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|