Searched hist:"9 d2d0a5c" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/thunderbolt/ |
| H A D | test.c | 9d2d0a5c Fri Apr 01 09:24:28 CDT 2022 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> thunderbolt: Use different lane for second DisplayPort tunnel
Brad reported that on Apple hardware with Light Ridge or Falcon Ridge
controller, plugging in a chain of Thunderbolt displays (Light Ridge
based controllers) causes all kinds of tearing and flickering. The
reason for this is that on Thunderbolt 1 hardware there is no lane
bonding so we have two independent 10 Gb/s lanes, and currently Linux
tunnels both displays through the lane 1. This makes the displays to
share the 10 Gb/s bandwidth which may not be enough for higher
resolutions.
For this reason make the second tunnel go through the lane 0 instead.
This seems to match what the macOS connection manager is also doing.
Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
|
| H A D | tunnel.h | 9d2d0a5c Fri Apr 01 09:24:28 CDT 2022 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> thunderbolt: Use different lane for second DisplayPort tunnel
Brad reported that on Apple hardware with Light Ridge or Falcon Ridge
controller, plugging in a chain of Thunderbolt displays (Light Ridge
based controllers) causes all kinds of tearing and flickering. The
reason for this is that on Thunderbolt 1 hardware there is no lane
bonding so we have two independent 10 Gb/s lanes, and currently Linux
tunnels both displays through the lane 1. This makes the displays to
share the 10 Gb/s bandwidth which may not be enough for higher
resolutions.
For this reason make the second tunnel go through the lane 0 instead.
This seems to match what the macOS connection manager is also doing.
Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
|
| H A D | tunnel.c | 9d2d0a5c Fri Apr 01 09:24:28 CDT 2022 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> thunderbolt: Use different lane for second DisplayPort tunnel
Brad reported that on Apple hardware with Light Ridge or Falcon Ridge
controller, plugging in a chain of Thunderbolt displays (Light Ridge
based controllers) causes all kinds of tearing and flickering. The
reason for this is that on Thunderbolt 1 hardware there is no lane
bonding so we have two independent 10 Gb/s lanes, and currently Linux
tunnels both displays through the lane 1. This makes the displays to
share the 10 Gb/s bandwidth which may not be enough for higher
resolutions.
For this reason make the second tunnel go through the lane 0 instead.
This seems to match what the macOS connection manager is also doing.
Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
|
| H A D | tb.c | 9d2d0a5c Fri Apr 01 09:24:28 CDT 2022 Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> thunderbolt: Use different lane for second DisplayPort tunnel
Brad reported that on Apple hardware with Light Ridge or Falcon Ridge
controller, plugging in a chain of Thunderbolt displays (Light Ridge
based controllers) causes all kinds of tearing and flickering. The
reason for this is that on Thunderbolt 1 hardware there is no lane
bonding so we have two independent 10 Gb/s lanes, and currently Linux
tunnels both displays through the lane 1. This makes the displays to
share the 10 Gb/s bandwidth which may not be enough for higher
resolutions.
For this reason make the second tunnel go through the lane 0 instead.
This seems to match what the macOS connection manager is also doing.
Reported-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Brad Campbell <lists2009@fnarfbargle.com>
|