Searched hist:92261156 (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/scsi/libfc/ |
| H A D | fc_disc.c | 92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
|
| H A D | fc_exch.c | 92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
|
| H A D | fc_rport.c | 92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
|
| H A D | fc_lport.c | 92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/scsi/ |
| H A D | libfc.h | 92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
92261156 Tue Jul 20 17:21:12 CDT 2010 Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com> [SCSI] libfc: don't require a local exchange for incoming requests
Incoming requests shouldn't require a local exchange if we're
just going to reply with one or two frames and don't expect
anything further. Don't allocate exchanges for such requests
until requested by the upper-layer protocol.
The sequence is always NULL for new requests, so remove
that as an argument to request handlers.
Also change the first argument to lport->tt.seq_els_rsp_send
from the sequence pointer to the received frame pointer, to
supply the exchange IDs and destination ID info.
Signed-off-by: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
|