| /openbmc/linux/drivers/mtd/tests/ |
| H A D | speedtest.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtd_test.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/mtd/ |
| H A D | rfd_ftl.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | nftlmount.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdblock.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | inftlmount.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | ftl.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdswap.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdoops.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdconcat.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | sm_ftl.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdpart.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| H A D | mtdchar.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/jffs2/ |
| H A D | erase.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/mtd/ubi/ |
| H A D | io.c | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/mtd/ |
| H A D | mtd.h | 8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
8f347c42 Mon Feb 12 15:03:10 CST 2018 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> mtd: Unconditionally update ->fail_addr and ->addr in part_erase()
->fail_addr and ->addr can be updated no matter the result of
parent->_erase(), we just need to remove the code doing the same thing
in mtd_erase_callback() to avoid adjusting those fields twice.
Note that this can be done because all MTD users have been converted to
not pass an erase_info->callback() and are thus only taking the
->addr_fail and ->addr fields into account after part_erase() has
returned.
While we're at it, get rid of the erase_info->mtd field which was only
needed to let mtd_erase_callback() get the partition device back.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
|