| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfsd/ |
| H A D | nfsd.h | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | nfssvc.c | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| H A D | nfsctl.c | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/nfs/ |
| H A D | callback.c | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/lockd/ |
| H A D | svc.c | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/sunrpc/ |
| H A D | svc.h | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/sunrpc/ |
| H A D | svc.c | 8c62d127 Sun Nov 28 22:51:25 CST 2021 NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions.
svc_destroy() is poorly named - it doesn't necessarily destroy the svc,
it might just reduce the ref count.
nfsd_destroy() is poorly named for the same reason.
This patch:
- removes the refcount functionality from svc_destroy(), moving it to
a new svc_put(). Almost all previous callers of svc_destroy() now
call svc_put().
- renames nfsd_destroy() to nfsd_put() and improves the code, using
the new svc_destroy() rather than svc_put()
- removes a few comments that explain the important for balanced
get/put calls. This should be obvious.
The only non-trivial part of this is that svc_destroy() would call
svc_sock_update() on a non-final decrement. It can no longer do that,
and svc_put() isn't really a good place of it. This call is now made
from svc_exit_thread() which seems like a good place. This makes the
call *before* sv_nrthreads is decremented rather than after. This
is not particularly important as the call just sets a flag which
causes sv_nrthreads set be checked later. A subsequent patch will
improve the ordering.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
|