| /openbmc/linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ |
| H A D | kvm_book3s_asm.h | 898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
|
| H A D | kvm_book3s.h | 898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/powerpc/kvm/ |
| H A D | book3s_hv_builtin.c | 898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
|
| H A D | book3s_hv.c | 898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
898b25b2 Thu Jun 22 00:08:42 CDT 2017 Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Simplify dynamic micro-threading code
Since commit b009031f74da ("KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Take out virtual
core piggybacking code", 2016-09-15), we only have at most one
vcore per subcore. Previously, the fact that there might be more
than one vcore per subcore meant that we had the notion of a
"master vcore", which was the vcore that controlled thread 0 of
the subcore. We also needed a list per subcore in the core_info
struct to record which vcores belonged to each subcore. Now that
there can only be one vcore in the subcore, we can replace the
list with a simple pointer and get rid of the notion of the
master vcore (and in fact treat every vcore as a master vcore).
We can also get rid of the subcore_vm[] field in the core_info
struct since it is never read.
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
|