Searched hist:"82 d43437" (Results 1 – 3 of 3) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/uapi/asm-generic/ |
| H A D | signal-defs.h | 82d43437 Fri Oct 29 09:14:19 CDT 2021 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed
commit 00b06da29cf9dc633cdba87acd3f57f4df3fd5c7 upstream.
As Andy pointed out that there are races between
force_sig_info_to_task and sigaction[1] when force_sig_info_task. As
Kees discovered[2] ptrace is also able to change these signals.
In the case of seeccomp killing a process with a signal it is a
security violation to allow the signal to be caught or manipulated.
Solve this problem by introducing a new flag SA_IMMUTABLE that
prevents sigaction and ptrace from modifying these forced signals.
This flag is carefully made kernel internal so that no new ABI is
introduced.
Longer term I think this can be solved by guaranteeing short circuit
delivery of signals in this case. Unfortunately reliable and
guaranteed short circuit delivery of these signals is still a ways off
from being implemented, tested, and merged. So I have implemented a much
simpler alternative for now.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b5d52d25-7bde-4030-a7b1-7c6f8ab90660@www.fastmail.com
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202110281136.5CE65399A7@keescook
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 307d522f5eb8 ("signal/seccomp: Refactor seccomp signal and coredump generation")
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | signal_types.h | 82d43437 Fri Oct 29 09:14:19 CDT 2021 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed
commit 00b06da29cf9dc633cdba87acd3f57f4df3fd5c7 upstream.
As Andy pointed out that there are races between
force_sig_info_to_task and sigaction[1] when force_sig_info_task. As
Kees discovered[2] ptrace is also able to change these signals.
In the case of seeccomp killing a process with a signal it is a
security violation to allow the signal to be caught or manipulated.
Solve this problem by introducing a new flag SA_IMMUTABLE that
prevents sigaction and ptrace from modifying these forced signals.
This flag is carefully made kernel internal so that no new ABI is
introduced.
Longer term I think this can be solved by guaranteeing short circuit
delivery of signals in this case. Unfortunately reliable and
guaranteed short circuit delivery of these signals is still a ways off
from being implemented, tested, and merged. So I have implemented a much
simpler alternative for now.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b5d52d25-7bde-4030-a7b1-7c6f8ab90660@www.fastmail.com
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202110281136.5CE65399A7@keescook
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 307d522f5eb8 ("signal/seccomp: Refactor seccomp signal and coredump generation")
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/ |
| H A D | signal.c | 82d43437 Fri Oct 29 09:14:19 CDT 2021 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> signal: Add SA_IMMUTABLE to ensure forced siganls do not get changed
commit 00b06da29cf9dc633cdba87acd3f57f4df3fd5c7 upstream.
As Andy pointed out that there are races between
force_sig_info_to_task and sigaction[1] when force_sig_info_task. As
Kees discovered[2] ptrace is also able to change these signals.
In the case of seeccomp killing a process with a signal it is a
security violation to allow the signal to be caught or manipulated.
Solve this problem by introducing a new flag SA_IMMUTABLE that
prevents sigaction and ptrace from modifying these forced signals.
This flag is carefully made kernel internal so that no new ABI is
introduced.
Longer term I think this can be solved by guaranteeing short circuit
delivery of signals in this case. Unfortunately reliable and
guaranteed short circuit delivery of these signals is still a ways off
from being implemented, tested, and merged. So I have implemented a much
simpler alternative for now.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b5d52d25-7bde-4030-a7b1-7c6f8ab90660@www.fastmail.com
[2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/202110281136.5CE65399A7@keescook
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 307d522f5eb8 ("signal/seccomp: Refactor seccomp signal and coredump generation")
Tested-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|