Searched hist:82809601 (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap1/ |
| H A D | dma.c | 82809601 Tue Oct 30 13:03:22 CDT 2012 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> ARM: OMAP: Remove cpu_is_omap usage from plat-omap/dma.c
This code will be eventually in drivers, and for the
code in the drivers we don't want to have any cpu_is_omap
usage. Those macros should be private to arch/arm/mach-omap1
and arch/arm/mach-omap2.
To fix this, let's move the define for dma_omap2plus()
to dma-omap.h, and use the existing dma_attr passed in
the platform_data as the revision registers are what they
are.
Note that we can now also remove the relative includes
introduced by the recent clean-up patches.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
82809601 Tue Oct 30 13:03:22 CDT 2012 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> ARM: OMAP: Remove cpu_is_omap usage from plat-omap/dma.c
This code will be eventually in drivers, and for the
code in the drivers we don't want to have any cpu_is_omap
usage. Those macros should be private to arch/arm/mach-omap1
and arch/arm/mach-omap2.
To fix this, let's move the define for dma_omap2plus()
to dma-omap.h, and use the existing dma_attr passed in
the platform_data as the revision registers are what they
are.
Note that we can now also remove the relative includes
introduced by the recent clean-up patches.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/arch/arm/mach-omap2/ |
| H A D | dma.c | 82809601 Tue Oct 30 13:03:22 CDT 2012 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> ARM: OMAP: Remove cpu_is_omap usage from plat-omap/dma.c
This code will be eventually in drivers, and for the
code in the drivers we don't want to have any cpu_is_omap
usage. Those macros should be private to arch/arm/mach-omap1
and arch/arm/mach-omap2.
To fix this, let's move the define for dma_omap2plus()
to dma-omap.h, and use the existing dma_attr passed in
the platform_data as the revision registers are what they
are.
Note that we can now also remove the relative includes
introduced by the recent clean-up patches.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
82809601 Tue Oct 30 13:03:22 CDT 2012 Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> ARM: OMAP: Remove cpu_is_omap usage from plat-omap/dma.c
This code will be eventually in drivers, and for the
code in the drivers we don't want to have any cpu_is_omap
usage. Those macros should be private to arch/arm/mach-omap1
and arch/arm/mach-omap2.
To fix this, let's move the define for dma_omap2plus()
to dma-omap.h, and use the existing dma_attr passed in
the platform_data as the revision registers are what they
are.
Note that we can now also remove the relative includes
introduced by the recent clean-up patches.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
|