Searched hist:"7 e170c6e" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/input/touchscreen/ |
| H A D | ti_am335x_tsc.c | 7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/mfd/ |
| H A D | ti_am335x_tscadc.h | 7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/mfd/ |
| H A D | ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/iio/adc/ |
| H A D | ti_am335x_adc.c | 7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
7e170c6e Thu Dec 19 09:28:29 CST 2013 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Don't read back REG_SE
The purpose of reg_se_cache has been defeated. It should avoid the
read-back of the register to avoid the latency and the fact that the
bits are reset to 0 after the individual conversation took place.
The reason why this is required like this to work, is that read-back of
the register removes the bits of the ADC so they do not start another
conversation after the register is re-written from the TSC side for the
update.
To avoid the not required read-back I introduce a "set once" variant which
does not update the cache mask. After the conversation completes, the
bit is removed from the SE register anyway and we don't plan a new
conversation "any time soon". The current set function is renamed to
set_cache to distinguish the two operations.
This is a small preparation for a larger sync-rework.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
|