Searched hist:"7 be5ac5f" (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/drivers/mmc/host/ |
| H A D | mmci.h | 7be5ac5f Fri Jun 16 15:42:23 CDT 2023 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> mmc: mmci: Make busy complete state machine explicit
This refactors the ->busy_complete() callback currently
only used by Ux500 and STM32 to handle busy detection on
hardware where one and the same IRQ is fired whether we get
a start or an end signal on busy detect.
The code is currently using the cached status from the
command IRQ in ->busy_status as a state to select what to
do next: if this state is non-zero we are waiting for
IRQs and if it is zero we treat the state as the starting
point for a busy detect wait cycle.
Make this explicit by creating a state machine where the
->busy_complete callback moves between three states.
The Ux500 busy detect code currently assumes this order:
we enable the busy detect IRQ, get a busy start IRQ, then a
busy end IRQ, and then we clear and mask this IRQ and
proceed.
We insert debug prints for unexpected states.
This works as before on most cards, however on a
problematic card that is not working with busy detect, and
which I have been debugging, the following happens a lot:
[ 3.380554] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time
[ 3.387420] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time
[ 3.394561] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: lost busy status
when waiting for busy start IRQ
This probably means that the busy detect start IRQ has
already occurred when we start executing the
->busy_complete() callbacks, and the busy detect end IRQ
is counted as the start IRQ, and this is what is causing
the card to not be detected properly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405-pl180-busydetect-fix-v7-5-69a7164f2a61@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
|
| H A D | mmci.c | 7be5ac5f Fri Jun 16 15:42:23 CDT 2023 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> mmc: mmci: Make busy complete state machine explicit
This refactors the ->busy_complete() callback currently
only used by Ux500 and STM32 to handle busy detection on
hardware where one and the same IRQ is fired whether we get
a start or an end signal on busy detect.
The code is currently using the cached status from the
command IRQ in ->busy_status as a state to select what to
do next: if this state is non-zero we are waiting for
IRQs and if it is zero we treat the state as the starting
point for a busy detect wait cycle.
Make this explicit by creating a state machine where the
->busy_complete callback moves between three states.
The Ux500 busy detect code currently assumes this order:
we enable the busy detect IRQ, get a busy start IRQ, then a
busy end IRQ, and then we clear and mask this IRQ and
proceed.
We insert debug prints for unexpected states.
This works as before on most cards, however on a
problematic card that is not working with busy detect, and
which I have been debugging, the following happens a lot:
[ 3.380554] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time
[ 3.387420] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: no busy signalling in time
[ 3.394561] mmci-pl18x 80005000.mmc: lost busy status
when waiting for busy start IRQ
This probably means that the busy detect start IRQ has
already occurred when we start executing the
->busy_complete() callbacks, and the busy detect end IRQ
is counted as the start IRQ, and this is what is causing
the card to not be detected properly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405-pl180-busydetect-fix-v7-5-69a7164f2a61@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
|