Searched hist:"79 dbd1ba" (Results 1 – 4 of 4) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ceph/ |
| H A D | messenger.h | 79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ceph/ |
| H A D | messenger.c | 79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| H A D | osd_client.c | 79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|
| /openbmc/linux/fs/ceph/ |
| H A D | mds_client.c | 79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
79dbd1ba Mon Oct 26 16:23:56 CDT 2015 Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> libceph: msg signing callouts don't need con argument
We can use msg->con instead - at the point we sign an outgoing message
or check the signature on the incoming one, msg->con is always set. We
wouldn't know how to sign a message without an associated session (i.e.
msg->con == NULL) and being able to sign a message using an explicitly
provided authorizer is of no use.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
|