Searched hist:"798 c75a0" (Results 1 – 5 of 5) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/fs/kernfs/ |
| H A D | symlink.c | 798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| H A D | kernfs-internal.h | 798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| H A D | file.c | 798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| H A D | dir.c | 798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | kernfs.h | 798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
798c75a0 Mon Jan 13 16:36:03 CST 2014 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Revert "kernfs: remove KERNFS_REMOVED"
This reverts commit ae34372eb8408b3d07e870f1939f99007a730d28.
Tejun writes:
I'm sorry but can you please revert the whole series?
get_active() waiting while a node is deactivated has potential
to lead to deadlock and that deactivate/reactivate interface is
something fundamentally flawed and that cgroup will have to work
with the remove_self() like everybody else. IOW, I think the
first posting was correct.
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|