| /openbmc/linux/net/xfrm/ |
| H A D | xfrm_device.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ipv4/ |
| H A D | ip_forward.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| H A D | ip_output.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/mpls/ |
| H A D | af_mpls.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/ipv6/ |
| H A D | ip6_output.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/include/linux/ |
| H A D | skbuff.h | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
| /openbmc/linux/net/core/ |
| H A D | skbuff.c | 779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
779b7931 Thu Mar 01 00:13:37 CST 2018 Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net> net: rename skb_gso_validate_mtu -> skb_gso_validate_network_len
If you take a GSO skb, and split it into packets, will the network
length (L3 headers + L4 headers + payload) of those packets be small
enough to fit within a given MTU?
skb_gso_validate_mtu gives you the answer to that question. However,
we recently added to add a way to validate the MAC length of a split GSO
skb (L2+L3+L4+payload), and the names get confusing, so rename
skb_gso_validate_mtu to skb_gso_validate_network_len
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|