Searched hist:"743 f5cdb" (Results 1 – 1 of 1) sorted by relevance
| /openbmc/linux/kernel/time/ |
| H A D | time.c | 743f5cdb Wed Aug 29 07:50:52 CDT 2018 kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> y2038: __get_old_timespec32() can be static
The kbuild test robot reports two new warnings with the previous
patch:
kernel/time/time.c:866:5: sparse: symbol '__get_old_timespec32' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/time/time.c:882:5: sparse: symbol '__put_old_timespec32' was not declared. Should it be static?
These are actually older bugs, but came up now after the
symbol got renamed. Fortunately, commit afef05cf238c ("time:
Enable get/put_compat_itimerspec64 always") makes the two functions
(__compat_get_timespec64/__compat_get_timespec64) local to time.c already,
so we can mark them as 'static'.
Fixes: ee16c8f415e4 ("y2038: Globally rename compat_time to old_time32")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[arnd: added changelog text]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
743f5cdb Wed Aug 29 07:50:52 CDT 2018 kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> y2038: __get_old_timespec32() can be static
The kbuild test robot reports two new warnings with the previous
patch:
kernel/time/time.c:866:5: sparse: symbol '__get_old_timespec32' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/time/time.c:882:5: sparse: symbol '__put_old_timespec32' was not declared. Should it be static?
These are actually older bugs, but came up now after the
symbol got renamed. Fortunately, commit afef05cf238c ("time:
Enable get/put_compat_itimerspec64 always") makes the two functions
(__compat_get_timespec64/__compat_get_timespec64) local to time.c already,
so we can mark them as 'static'.
Fixes: ee16c8f415e4 ("y2038: Globally rename compat_time to old_time32")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[arnd: added changelog text]
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
|